
“NEW GOVERNMENT” CONTRADICTING TO TIME
The society has a natural question regarding the actions of the so-called new government of Armenia: are those actions a genuine wish, an honest wish to change something or are they imitation aimed to relieve public discontent and to win over the society, creating the impression that not only the president but also the quality of government has changed. In this connection, the question occurs what determines the change of that quality if the actions of the government are not imitation. Is the reason for the change of the quality Levon Ter-Petrosyan who managed to seriously mobilize the society and turn the society into a factor which the government cannot ignore anymore? Or is the change of the quality of the government determined by the requirements of time, and independent from Levon Ter-Petrosyan’s participation, the government would do what it is doing now? Or is the change of quality of government determined by the change of president, that Robert Kocharyan is not the president anymore, and he was the obstacle to the change of the quality of government? No doubt there will be people who will think, maybe righteously, that the reason of change of quality of the actions of the government is not important but the change with its result. Maybe. But first of all the result is not noticed. Maybe it takes time but the fact is that the result is not seen. And perhaps the reason of that change is important to reach the result or to bring the result closer. After all, the revelation of the imitational nature of change is also a result, an important result which will prevent the government’s tactics of misleading the society in a new way. Perhaps it is worthwhile to view the abovementioned three reasons for the external change of the government’s actions separately. If Levon Ter-Petrosyan and the popular movement led by him imposes the qualitative change on the government, it is a fact that it is a serious political factor, therefore it is obvious that after the presidential election the political status quo has changed. And in that situation, if the government has a genuine wish to change its quality, it must hold an early parliamentary election because no system of public administration can be important if the representational body of that system, the parliament, does not reflect the status quo in the country. If the external signs of the change of quality of government are determined by the imperatives of the time, in that case, if the government has a genuine wish to change qualitatively, it should take into account all the requirements of time rather than replace the cadres of the so-called former (1998-2008) government by one another, to confuse the time and all the animate and inanimate objects in it. If the replacement of the personality of Robert Kocharyan is the matter, in order to prove the honesty of efforts to change qualitatively and to protect the society from different “psychological disorders” Serge Sargsyan must make a political evaluation of the government of Robert Kocharyan, especially regarding the problems which are of core importance for the country, pointing out to what he thinks was the main mistake of Robert Kocharyan. It does not mean to judge or prosecute Robert Kocharyan. However, if there were occurrences in the country which are perceived as crimes among the society, Serge Sargsyan must enable Robert Kocharyan to prove that he is innocent, and enable the society to prove that he is guilty. This opportunity in any normal country is an independent judicial system. It is possible that the external signs of change of the quality of the present (after 2008) government are determined by all the three reasons mentioned above. In that case too, Serge Sargsyan’s actions regarding every separate reason remain the same. Simply he must do three things at once if he honestly wants to shape a new government in Armenia, compliant with the requirements of the society and time, rather than deepen his controversy with the society and time by renovating the mechanisms of cheating the citizens. HAKOB BADALYAN
“NEW GOVERNMENT” CONTRADICTING TO TIME
The society has a natural question regarding the actions of the so-called new government of Armenia: are those actions a genuine wish, an honest wish to change something or are they imitation aimed to ...KHASHTARAK SCHOOL RENOVATION PROJECT IS LAUNCHED
Hayastan All-Armenian Fund is pleased to announce the launch of Khashtarak school renovation and refurbishment, an initiative that was on the waiting list for priorities in Tavush region for years. The ...POLITICAL LIFE IS NOT ONLY “POLITICAL CORRUPTION”
On July 11 the leader of the Heritage Party Raffi Hovannisian said in his address to the conference of the party that the ad hoc committee to inquire into the “case of March 1” is not credulous because ...SERGE SARGSYAN VISITED EMBASSY OF FRANCE
Today Serge Sargsyan visited the French embassy to Armenia on the national holiday of France. He congratulated the staff of the embassy. Serge Sargsyan appreciated the high level of Armenian and French ...ACTIVITIES OF THE CITY HALL IN NUMBERS
The mayor of Yerevan Yervand Zakharyan presented the report on the activities of the city authorities in the first half of 2008 on July 14. According to the mayor, the social and economic action plan ...
IS SERGE SARGSYAN SACRIFICING IMMUNITY OF ARMENIANS?
A WAY WHICH SEEMS USELESS BUT TAKES THERE FASTER
LONDON TAKES OLYMPICS FIRE FOR 2012
CONGRESS GIVES SUPPORTERS AND GOVERNMENT TEN DAYS TO REST
KOCHARYAN VS SARGSYAN: BATTLE FOR REAL POWER
RUDIK HOVSEPYAN WAS ATTACKED IN LOS ANGELES

ALVINA ZAKARYAN WAS DISMISSED
ARGENTINA WILL HAVE EMBASSY TO ARMENIA
WHAT IS COMMON BETWEEN ARMENIAN DRAMS AND ARTHUR ABRAHAM?
ANOTHER PROVOCATION AGAINST THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE SITTING PROTEST

CZECH FOREIGN MINISTER HOSTED BY LEVON TER-PETROSYAN
ONE MORE STEP TOWARDS PUBLIC CONFIDENCE
RUSSIAN BUSINESS HAS NO PROBLEMS
UN WILL HELP ARMENIA
OFFICE OF PROSECUTOR GENERAL WILL MONITOR GARRISONS
- 1862 The police arrest Nalbandyan (writer and political activist).
- 1904 Birth of painter Vostanik Adoyan (Arshile Gorky) in Van (Western Armenia). He committed suicide in 1948.
- 1933 Death of Leninist Guards representative, Issahak Lalayants in Moscow. He was born in 1870.
- 1935 Opening of the Armenian Section in the Academy of Science of the USSR.
ARMENIAN NEWS
INTERACTIVE NEWS
INFORMATION
MY ARMTOWN

How to quit smoking?
How to write in Armenian on Windows XP?

