
THE BALL IN THE FIELD BELONGING TO ARMENIAN PAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT
These days when the pro-oppositional powers backing LTP, loyal to their fundamental thesis “the worse the better” are making efforts to intensify the atmosphere of the social confrontation, certain political circles are over again trying to advance the hypothesis of extraordinary parliamentary elections, as a balm for discharge and a key for the dialogue between the authorities and the opposition.
Below we introduce the observation of the secretary of the Republican Parliamentary Faction Samvel Nikoyan regarding this and other issues.
“Firstly: have the elections on the state level ever become a tool for social solidarity. I would say, on the contrary. Consequently extraordinary elections can’t contribute to the stabilization of the situation. Moreover it is simply intolerable.
Secondly: the Constitution clearly enshrines the cases based on which we can dissolve the parliament and hold new elections: in case the parliament doesn’t confirm the government program within two months, in case the parliament doesn’t convene sessions for more than three months, in case the parliament is unable to take decisions within three months.
Which means if the parliament is working regularly and totally fulfils its obligation, its independent activity must be guaranteed by the Constitution, so that other wings of the ruling power won’t be able to dissolve the parliament. This is a mechanism of balancing different wings of the ruling power and mutual moderations. And those who propose holding extraordinary elections, either don’t have any idea about the Constitution or they simply don’t want to.”
“In 2007 Armenian Pan National Movement boycotted the Parliamentary elections and now they regret, and they want to fill this gap. How do you estimate this stance from the point of view of the formation of political culture and the accomplishment of the political system?”
“Each political power, if it has intentions to participate in the political processes and if it is interested in the stabilization of the political field, must start the construction of that system not from the roof but from the base, which is the local self government.
So they should start from the elections of the Local Self Government-Bodies and settle there, later participate in the parliamentary elections, in case of getting sufficient votes; participate in the formation of the government and only after that to think about running for president with their own candidate.
This is the foundation based on which you can build the roof. The contrary is not only incorrect from the point of view of political sciences but also without any prospect.
Political powers must have active participation in all the elections. You can’t pin your hopes upon an individual, his authority, and rhetorical talent. How can you suddenly run for president without any participation in the political processes taking place in your country?
Why didn’t they participate in the parliamentary elections? Because they were not sure in their success, because they were well aware that they don’t have sufficient weight in the society. How can a political power try to come to power being attached to an individual? Is it the fault of the state or the people that, before, they didn’t have any desire to participate in the political processes? Are we obliged to adapt our state and political processes with their caprice? Of course no!”
“Radical opposition responses to your readiness for dialogue by making announcements about the new season of rallies. They even used the anniversary of the Genocide, to use their aggressive anti-governmental advocacy. Don’t you think that in such circumstance the proposals for dialogues heard form “inside and outside” are simply senseless?”
“Proposals for dialogue can’t be senseless, no matter who makes them. In any case dialogue is indispensable. We have made proposals for dialogue both before and after the elections. Many political powers, both parliamentary and extra-parliamentary, have entered the field of dialogue, right up to the formation of coalition.
It is another issue that some part of the pro-oppositional camp is not inclined to having a dialogue. Of course it is desirable to see the before mentioned part of the opposition participating in the dialogue. But firstly we must clarify one thing: dialogue with whom and what are the conditions?
Dialogue usually assumes two parties: the ruling power and the opposition. Supreme authority in Armenia belongs to the President of the Republic. He is the one to have a dialogue with the opposition. If this part of the opposition doesn’t accept the decision of the Constitutional Court, which means they don’t recognize the legitimacy of the President, who should they negotiate with?
That is to say dialogue first of all presumes dialogue with the President, which means they must accept the election returns and the decision of the Constitutional Court. This means the ball is in their field. They must recognize the election returns, as it is written in PACE resolution in black and white, and only after that, those who have nothing to do with the massive violence, robbery and devastations must be immediately released.
But, I would like to repeat: how can we speak about a dialogue when one party doesn’t accept the other one, when the only thing they want is to seize power and they speak only about the overthrow of power. In this case it is really senseless to speak about a dialogue.”
- LILIT POGHOSYAN
Discussion
Rafael wrote:
Taking into account that the past 2 administration rejuvinized from the Pan Armenian party, it is then appropriate to imply that the motto of 'the worse, the better' is being redeveloped by the current administration. For the past 17 years the Armenian economic strategy was as follows: Make the living standards of average citizens as difficult as possible so they can migrate, and help out their families back home...then monopolize all the necessities (beef, bread, transportation, etc) the domestic people need. This way the gov't can withdraw itself as the main contributor of societal welfare.
ELECTIONS OR REFORMS?
ARMEN TSATOURYANTwo incompatible solutions To find a peaceful way out of the country’s current situation, two different options are proposed. If we immediately and unconditionally rule out the radical opposition’s ...THE BALL IN THE FIELD BELONGING TO ARMENIAN PAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT
LILIT POGHOSYAN 1These days when the pro-oppositional powers backing LTP, loyal to their fundamental thesis “the worse the better” are making efforts to intensify the atmosphere of the social confrontation, certain political ...HOLDING EXTRAORDINARY PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS – NOT AN AND IN ITSELF
S. HAROUTYUNYANMP VICTOR DALLAKYAN is also against the idea of neutralizing the post-electoral tension through extra-ordinary parliamentary elections, but his considerations are different. “During the hour of parliamentary ...OBLIVIOUS STYOPA
Yesterday the representative of “Heritage” parliamentary faction Styopa Safaryan announced that allegedly due to Raffi Hovhannisyan’s mediation Ter-Petrosyan agreed to have a dialogue with Serge Sargsyan, ...28 CRIMINAL CASES
As of April 23, 28 criminal cases under the proceeding of RA Special Investigation Service have been sent to the court, against those who breached the constitutional order, instigated, and organized massive ...THE VISIT OF THE EMISSARIES
“Armenian Youth Party has initiated a visit of Armenian Youth delegation to the USA at the beginning of June. It will be the visit of the so-called Emissaries, during which we will try to convey the true ...
DIALOGUE TO BE CONDUCTED WITH SOCIETY
LILIT POGHOSYANNOT EVERYONE ACCEPTS
FIFTH COLUMN IN ARMENIA
Administration of National Democratic Party, July 20, 2008HOW TO TURN ARCHIPELAGO INTO A MAINLAND
KAREN NAHAPETYANSITUATION CONTAINING ELEMENTS OF PUBLIC CRISIS
KIMA YEGHYAZARYAN
PRESIDENT SERGE SARGSYAN’S ADDRESS IN MEMORY OF THE VICTIMS OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE
COUNCIL OF EUROPE IMPOSES NOTHING ON ARMENIA
WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT FROM A TURK
ARMENIA - CHAMPION OF EUROPE

WHAT GOAL DO THE SUCCESSIVE HEARINGS PURSUE?
VARDAN GRIGORYANWITH THE PURPOSE OF DISTRACTING ATTENTION
APRIL 24 – DAY OF SOLIDARITY OF ALL ARMENIANS
“HAYOTS ASHKHARH”OBLIVIOUS STYOPA
WHETHER THE EX-PRESIDENT HAS A MORAL RIGHT
ELECTIONS OR REFORMS?
ARMEN TSATOURYAN
- 1879 Death of Stepanos Nazaryan (public figure) in Moscow (Russia). He published the "Hyusisapail" (Aurora Borealis) monthly.
- 1904 The great battle of Semal (the Sassoon rebellion) took place under the leadership of General Andraneek. Hrair (Armenak Ghazarian) was killed in the fighting. He was born in 1864.
- 1920 Death of Vrtanes Papazyan (writer) in Yerevan. He was born in 1866.
- 1921 The "Self-government of Syunik" is re-organized by the Dashnaks, as the "Government of Mountainous Armenia".
- 1953 Completion of the first stage of construction of the Gyumush hydroelectric power station.
ARMENIAN NEWS
INTERACTIVE NEWS
INFORMATION
MY ARMTOWN

How to quit smoking?
How to write in Armenian on Windows XP?

