ARMENIA FACING THE CROSSWAY

Fall Or Abrupt Upgrade

The delegates of Ago Monitoring Group of the Council of Europe Ministers’ Committee met with the representatives of the parliamentary factions, members of Armenian delegation of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and the Speaker of the National Assembly Tigran Torosyan.
What task does Ago group set to our legislative bodies? To what extent is the package of proposals consisting of 6 points, with which the European high-ranking officials hope to mitigate the tensed situation created after March 1 events, acceptable for us.
Below we introduce the clarifications of the Head of PACE delegation, Head of the Committee on Legal Affairs Davit Harutyunyan.
“During the meeting we touched upon the 6 proposals, introduced to the countries. But there are certain issues, typical of parliamentary work. In this context we discussed certain issues, particularly the issue of our cooperation with the Council of Europe, as well as issues concerning the preliminary expert conclusions regarding the bills. We attached special importance to the opinion of the Venice Committee regarding the amendments in the law on “Rallies, Demonstrations, and Gatherings”. Ago group insisted on discussing that issue.
The next important issue is the dialogue, the dialogue between the political powers. In this regard the members of the delegation welcomed the proposals made by the President elect. The conversation is not only about the formation of coalition government. We specifically underscored that not all the political powers are ready to participate in the formation of the executive power and it is natural.
Moreover opposition doesn’t always agree to form part of government and the second proposal made by the President elect is much more important – which is - to form a political agenda and jointly discuss all the issues faced by the country. Fatal issues, such as the organization of the election process, the accomplishment of an independent judiciary, Mass Media, freedom of speech, etc.
We came to an agreement that the cooperation around the before mentioned issues is one of the most serious factors, which can provide an opportunity for the country’s development. One thing is evident - the situation is unique, it is, we can say critical, and we haven’t yet overcome this crisis. But another thing is that this situation can’t last long. This is our opinion and Ago group agreed that there are two options for Armenia – fall or abrupt rise. And I really expect that we will overcome this situation with a bigger potential.”
“Did they specify any time limits for the review of the amendments of the law on “Rallies, Demonstrations, and Gatherings?”
“No time limits have been specified. However, in my opinion, the issue is urgent.”
”What does Venice Committee propose - to return to the preliminary version of the law?”
“The thing is, the right on rallies, demonstrations and gatherings is considered one of the most important rights, and the restrictions must comply with the international standards. Of course there are restrictions in all the countries, and each country envisages certain legal mechanisms, but the Council of Europe and Europe in general are trying to form so-called universal standards.
The European Court has many times touched upon these restrictions and distinguished by their decision, which restrictions are substantiated and which invasive, that is to say “invading” in the sphere of human rights.
In this respect the restrictions envisaged in the law must be of extreme indispensability and moderate. Which means, when elaborating similar bills the principles of indispensability and moderation must prevail.
It is evident that the preliminary version of the law didn’t shoulder any responsibility for many issues and of course, sooner or later the parliament must have touched upon this issue. In my view it is a chance to correct our legal field, to envisage more moderate restrictions, and meanwhile working mechanisms, which will avert any disorders.”
“During the discussion did Ago group clarify what they mean by speaking about the necessity to conduct an independent “national investigation” of the March 1 tragic events?”
“In my view this issue needs additional discussion. Similar mechanisms are well known in accomplished democratic countries. But will those mechanisms, especially the parliamentary investigation insure public trust in our reality. I’m not sure. In my opinion we should observe the issue on another plane. Which is the goal? If the thing is in the public trust, then we must find the mechanisms, which will insure this trust. We can’t take the model of another country and artificially make it ours.”
LILIT POGHOSYAN

| Home | >>

E-mail article | Discuss article new!

RSS © Hayots Ashkhar

Headlines for April 02, 2008

ARMENIA FACING THE CROSSWAY
LILIT POGHOSYAN
Fall Or Abrupt Upgrade The delegates of Ago Monitoring Group of the Council of Europe Ministers’ Committee met with the representatives of the parliamentary factions, members of Armenian delegation ...
HUNGER-STRIKERS
Some newspapers report that 25 people detained in the framework of the criminal case instituted in connection with March 1 tragic events, being kept in the penitentiaries of the Ministry of Justice, went ...
MARCH 1 DISORDERS: ATTEMPT TO INCITE A WAR
GEVORG HAROUTYUNYAN
Interview with Doctor ARMEN AYVAZYAN, Head of ¡°Ararat¡± strategic planning center ¡°Mr. Ayvazyan, can the post-electoral developments be considered as a failed attempt of staging a ¡®colored¡¯ revolution?¡± ...
PRICES ON GAS NOT TO INCREASE
“ArmRusgasindustry” CJSC didn’t submit a claim regarding the increase of the prices on gas this year. According to the agreement signed between “Gasexport” OJSC (“Gasprom” OJSC daughter company) and ...