
THE LUXURY AND MISERY OF THE NATIVE ELITE
- It is evident that very soon we will eyewitness the essential innovation of the native elite and the country’s development is greatly conditioned by the success of this process.

“The minority and not the majority has ruled, rules and will always rule since the creation of the world. It works in all the forms and types of governing: be it monarchy, democracy, regressive or revolutionary epoch. There is no way to get rid of the minority’s governing and your democratic attempts to establish majority’s rule is, in essence, a miserable self-deception. The thing is, which minority rules - the best or the worst.”
Many people will most probably disagree with the words of the Russian great philosopher Berdiayev, but nevertheless, it covers a very important and principal issue: how to turn the governing minority, the elite, into the focal point of the best powers of society.
Touching upon the present situation: does the ruling system contribute to the involvement of the best and the worthiest among the elite.
If no, then why? What should we do to correct it?
The word “elite”, in our society arouses irony, at best, and more often it gives rise to negative emotions. But before joining the rare supporters or the big army of critics of elite, lets clarify the real meaning of the word “elite”.
There are various characterizations of this word, but more often, saying “elite” we mean a not big group of people who occupy leading positions, and who take pivotal decisions in the political, economic, and cultural sphere of the social life. As a rule mass consciousness excludes the involvement of the “men of art” among the elite.
In essence they usually make two demands to the elite. Which are these demands? They must be productive and fair. Productiveness assumes successful solution of the problems faced by the country and fairness: the solution of these issues to the benefit of the majority of society. The harmony of productiveness and fairness is as rare as ideal marriage.
But the problem is far not even in the total absence of productiveness and fairness. History shows that society is ready to tolerate unfair elite for a long period of time, if they manage to successfully pursue pan-national goals, for example in our case the pro-Armenian settlement of Karabakh issue.
The same way productive elite can enjoy the people’s support if they consider their activity fair. But woe to the elite which is neither productive nor fair.
Question number one: Can we consider our elite productive? Not certain representatives of elite, but the whole group that take decisions of state importance and control their implementation. Alas the answer is negative.
Sometimes we hear that allegedly correct and wonderful decisions are usually taken there on top levels, but the terrible bureaucratic implementation deforms them. But the high-ranking official who has no idea about how his “genius” program is going to be implemented, is simply good for nothing.
The contemporary native elite is successful in only two issues: pressuring the political opposition and the use of their position for personal and group purposes.
The last circumstance can hardly be considered productive, a ruling that assumes supremacy of pan-national goals over personal ones.
Of course the native financial and trade elite can be considered productive in terms of their personal enrichment. In all the other issues they are incomparably unsuccessful. Though frankly the majority of society doesn’t benefit from this success.
It is only by means of a gun, in the strictest sense of the word, that you can force the business elite to share their wealth with society, and meet half way their principal demands. The state, in essence, can commit itself to the role of the similar “gun”, by means of restricting personal and group benefits. But hawks will not pick out hawks’ eyes. The ancestral feature of the native elite (not only business, but also state-political) is a crying injustice towards society.
Without pressure our native elite will never change for the better. As the world practice shows, the fundamental self-transformation of the elite is possible only in case of serious challenges and threats. The situation is such at present.”
- “HAYOTS ASHKHARH”
Discussion
Armen wrote:
Wow, is this journalist jailed now?
After saying things more or less the way they are he/she will probably get jailed.
Here is another point the journalist might want to note:
Armenian Elite is not in Armenia. It lives outside Armenia. There are two ways in which Armenia can re-develop an Elite:
- The Elite comes and lives in Armenia. This is not plausible under present conditions as no sane mind will accepte to live in Armenia especially if they are educated and sucessful elsewhere.
- Armenia re-develops a new elite: this will take generational time. The next two generations will grow to form a good elite. That is, if they don't run away Armenia like all those before them.
One thing is sure: Robert and Serj do not look like an elite by any standards, except maybe the third world standards like Africa.
EVERYTHING WAS DONE WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE CONSTITUTION
ARTHUR HOVHANNISYAN 1
Interview with Justice Minister GEVORG DANIELYAN, Second-Class State Advisor of Justice
“Some people currently announce that by declaring a state of emergency, the President of the republic violated ...THE LUXURY AND MISERY OF THE NATIVE ELITE
“HAYOTS ASHKHARH” 1
It is evident that very soon we will eyewitness the essential innovation of the native elite and the country’s development is greatly conditioned by the success of this process.
“The minority and not ...AZERBAIJANI SIDE TORPEDOES THE MEETING
The steps and statements of Azerbaijani officials have nothing to do with their obligation of continuing the regulation process. They are rather false demonstrative commitments. Head of the Media Relation ...HOW TO COOPERATE WITH THESE PEOPLE?
19
“At the pre-election stage, I myself was in favor of a dialogue with L. Ter-Petrosyan’s team. But it turned out that such dialogue was impossible. We would meet with them around the table of negotiations, ...
COALITION – THE BEGINNING OF SERIOUS REFORMS
ARMEN TSATOURYAN
HOW TO COOPERATE WITH THESE PEOPLE?

THE SECRET STILL NOT REVEALED

THE PHENOMENON OF A “LAME DUCK” DOESN’T WORK IN ARMENIA
KAREN NAHAPETYAN
MANAGED TO AVOID CLASHES

U.S. SENDS POSITIVE SIGNALS TO ARMENIA
ARMEN TSATOURYAN
THE LUXURY AND MISERY OF THE NATIVE ELITE
“HAYOTS ASHKHARH”
THE IN-DEPTH REASON
SPECIAL ATTITUDE BY RUSSIA
“HAYOTS ASHKARH”DON’T PRESS YOUR “DEMOCRACY” ON US

- 1799 Birth of Eone Kish (Kishian), Hungarian Armenian revolutionary figure.
- 1827 General Ivan Paskevich is appointed Governor of the Caucasus and Commander of the Caucasian Special Corps.
- 1830 Birth of organist, conductor, teacher, and public figure, Anton Mayilian in Tbilissi.
- 1907 Birth of surgeon Ivan Gevorgian. He invented pain-killers and pioneered new ways for blood transfusion.
- 1920 The Drama Institute presents its first play.
- 1923 Birth of two-time hero and pilot Nelson Stepanian. The group of pilots led by Nelson Stepanian sank more than 50 enemy ships and destroyed 13 airplanes in World War Two. Nelson Stepanian flew 240 sorties. He died in a dogfight in 1944.
- 1928 Birth of artist and sculptor Ara Harootoonian. His great architectural work is the Sardarapat complex.
- 1988 The Supreme Soviet of the USSR rejects Artsakh's demand to be reunited with Armenia.
ARMENIAN NEWS
INTERACTIVE NEWS
INFORMATION
MY ARMTOWN

How to quit smoking?
How to write in Armenian on Windows XP?

